Mount & Blade: Warband

Mount & Blade: Warband game image

Overwhelmingly Positive

Total: 53.5 ThousandPositive: 52.3 ThousandNegative: 1.22 Thousand
98%
2%
Steam review score: 9

Sorry!

This game is not fully supported yet!

AI Review

Mount & Blade: Warband is a medieval action RPG that immerses you in the chaotic world of Calradia, where warfare reigns supreme. With an AI Community Rating of 88.49%, this game is celebrated for its unique blend of strategy, combat, and role-playing elements. Assemble your army, lead them into epic battles, and strive to claim the throne in a dynamic campaign filled with political intrigue and tactical warfare. The game features a detailed combat system, including realistic mounted combat, and offers both single-player and multiplayer modes, supporting up to 64 players in modes like Deathmatch, Siege, and Capture the Flag. Players praise its fun gameplay, extensive modding community, and the freedom to shape your own story. However, some criticize its outdated graphics, repetitive quests, and occasional bugs. If you’re looking for a deep, sandbox-style medieval experience with a strong community backing, Mount & Blade: Warband is a must-try.

What the community wishes

Improve quest variety and depth
Quests are repetitive and lack uniqueness, making the gameplay feel monotonous. Adding more diverse and engaging quests would enhance the overall experience.
Update outdated visuals and graphics
The game's graphics are outdated and could benefit from a visual overhaul to make it more appealing to modern players.
Add voice chat to multiplayer
The lack of VOIP or voice chat in multiplayer is a missed opportunity for better communication and coordination among players.
Enable co-op for main campaign
Allowing co-op play in the main campaign would significantly enhance the multiplayer experience and make the game more enjoyable.
Fix AI behavior during sieges
AI performance during sieges is poor and often frustrating. Improving AI behavior in these scenarios would make sieges more enjoyable and strategic.
Address persistent bugs and glitches
The game still suffers from bugs like enemy ghost parties and glitches that have not been fixed for over a decade, which detracts from the experience.
Enhance NPC interactions and believability
NPCs feel wooden and lack depth, making the game world feel empty. Improving NPC interactions and adding more life to the world would enhance immersion.
Add more story-driven content
The base game lacks a compelling story. Adding more story-driven quests or campaigns would provide a richer narrative experience.
Improve recruitment mechanics
Recruiting villagers is difficult even with high relations, leading to manpower shortages. Streamlining recruitment mechanics would improve gameplay balance.
Balance AI recruitment and army sizes
AI factions can amass large armies from minimal resources, which feels unfair. Balancing AI recruitment and army sizes would make the game more challenging yet fair.
Expand modding support and tools
While the modding community is strong, providing more tools and support for modders could lead to even more innovative and diverse mods.
Optimize game for modern macOS
The game is unplayable on recent macOS versions due to 32-bit limitations. Optimizing it for modern systems would make it accessible to more players.
Add more diplomatic options
The game lacks depth in diplomacy. Adding more diplomatic options and interactions would make kingdom management more engaging and strategic.
Improve endgame content and rewards
The endgame feels unrewarding, with no significant conclusion or recognition for conquering the entire map. Adding meaningful endgame content would enhance player satisfaction.
Enhance combat animations and fluidity
While the combat system is deep, animations can feel clunky. Improving combat animations and fluidity would make battles more visually appealing and satisfying.
Add more dynamic world events
The game world can feel static. Introducing more dynamic world events would make the game feel more alive and unpredictable.
Improve multiplayer matchmaking and balance
Multiplayer matchmaking and balance could be improved to ensure fair and competitive matches, enhancing the overall multiplayer experience.
Add more customization options
Players desire more customization options for characters, armies, and kingdoms. Adding more customization would increase replayability and personalization.
Expand Viking Conquest-like DLCs
The Viking Conquest DLC was well-received for its story and depth. Expanding with similar DLCs set in different historical periods would add variety.
Improve tutorial and onboarding experience
New players may find the game overwhelming. Enhancing the tutorial and onboarding experience would help new players understand the game mechanics more easily.

Reviews

Toxicity trend

N-Grams

very good storyrich in gameplaystill full ofminor bugs presentworth the pricesignificant brain usagevery good graphicshugely missed opportunityvery good audiowaste my timeclunky and obtusevery good gamevery good gameplayvery outdated andgame of thecombat is veryrun this gameexcellent combat systemcomplete and uttervery skill based

Keywords

What the community loves
fun
7
mods
6
best
5
great
5
unique
4
recommend
4
good
4
favorite
4
amazing
4
love
3
better
3
addictive
3
combat
3
experience
2
diplomacy
2
Where the community is undecided
mods
10
multiplayer
7
game
4
hours
4
vanilla
4
combat
4
DLC
4
played
3
medieval
3
time
3
story
3
strategy
3
bannerlord
2
Bannerlord
2
Teens
2
What the community dislikes
hard
2
garbage
2
broken
2
outdated
2
unplayable
2
glitches
2
repetitive
2
bugs
2
clunky
2
expensive
2
barebone
1
behead
1
betrayed
1
beware
1
blaming
1

In-depth analysis of most impactful community reviews

Positive

Still an amazing and underrated game. While it doesn't have the best graphics or barely any voice acting this game is rich in gameplay, mechanics, and the game world. Negatives I would list would be things like, lack of unique and interesting quests. Quests are all the same. Visuals are outdated. Mods can help. Sometimes world of the game feels too empty. You just can't believe in these wooden npcs. Gameplay can become very repetitive but combat is very skill based and incredibly deep. This combat system though makes Skyrim's look like complete garbage! At times the combat can be clunky and a little too difficult to learn. The only thing I don't like about this game's online multiplayer is there's no VOIP or voice chat! Also the fact you can't play the main campaign in coop is also a hugely missed opportunity. The ai itself can be quite bad at times especially during sieges in this game which are absolute garbage! Game feels very outdated and very aged compared to the sequel, Mount and Blade II Bannerlord. I much prefer and easily recommend the sequel over this to be completely honest. THIS GAME IS STILL FULL OF BUGS LIKE ENEMY GHOST PARTIES AND GLITCHES! THEY STILL HAVE NOT FIXED ANY OF THIS OVER A DECADE LATER! All this did was waste my time. So thanks for that you dumb Turks.

  • Sentiments

    • I find the game to be amazing and underrated, with rich gameplay, mechanics, and a detailed game world, despite its outdated graphics and lack of voice acting.
    • I feel that the quests lack uniqueness and are repetitive, which detracts from the overall experience.
    • I appreciate the deep and skill-based combat system, which I believe surpasses Skyrim's combat system in complexity and depth.
    • I find the combat system to be clunky and difficult to learn at times, which can be frustrating.
    • I am disappointed by the lack of VOIP or voice chat in the online multiplayer, which limits communication and interaction.
    • I think the inability to play the main campaign in co-op mode is a missed opportunity that could have enhanced the game.
    • I find the AI to be quite bad, especially during sieges, which I consider to be poorly executed.
    • I feel the game feels outdated and aged compared to its sequel, Mount and Blade II Bannerlord, which I prefer and recommend over this one.
    • I am frustrated by the persistent bugs and glitches, such as enemy ghost parties, that have not been fixed over a decade later.
    • I believe mods can help improve the game, particularly in addressing its outdated visuals and empty world.

Positive

---{Graphics}--- ☐ You forget what reality is ☐ Beautiful ☑ Good ☐ Decent ☐ Bad ☐ Don‘t look too long at it ☐ Atari ---{Gameplay}--- ☑ Very good ☐ Good ☐ It‘s just gameplay ☐ Mehh ☐ Watch video instead ☐ Just don't ---{Audio}--- ☐ Eargasm ☑ Very good ☐ Good ☐ Not too bad ☐ I'm now deaf ☐ My ears bleeding ---{Audience}--- ☐ Kids ☑ Teens ☑ Adults ☐ All ---{PC Requirements}--- ☑ Toast Machine ☐ Potato ☐ Decent ☐ Fast ☐ Rich ☐ Nasa ---{Difficulity}--- ☐ Just press 'W' ☐ Easy ☑ Significant brain usage ☐ Easy to learn / Hard to master ☐ Difficult ☐ Dark Souls ---{Grind}--- ☑ Nothing to grind ☐ Only if u care about leaderboards/ranks ☐ Isnt necessary to progress ☐ Average grind level ☐ Too much grind ☐ You‘ll need a second life for grinding ---{Story}--- ☑ No Story ☐ Some lore ☐ Average ☐ Good ☐ Lovely ☐ Better than your life ---{Game Time}--- ☐ Long enough for a cup of coffee ☐ Short ☐ Average ☐ Long ☑ Infinity ---{Price}--- ☐ It’s free! ☑ Worth the price ☐ If it's on sale ☐ If u have some spare money left ☐ Not recommended ☐ You could also just burn your money ---{Bugs}--- ☐ Never heard of ☑ Minor bugs ☐ Can get annoying ☐ ARK: Survival Evolved ☐ Cyberbug 2077 ---{?/10}--- ☐1 ☐2 ☐3 ☐4 ☐5 ☐6 ☐7 ☐8 ☑9 ☐10

  • Sentiments

    • I find the graphics of the game to be good, which enhances the overall visual experience without being overly distracting or underwhelming.
    • The gameplay is very good, providing an engaging and enjoyable experience that keeps me invested in the game.
    • The audio quality is very good, adding to the immersive experience without being overwhelming or unpleasant.
    • The game is suitable for both teens and adults, making it accessible to a wide audience without being overly restrictive or inappropriate.
    • The PC requirements are minimal, as it can run on a 'toast machine,' which makes it accessible to players with lower-end systems.
    • The difficulty level requires significant brain usage, which I find challenging and rewarding, making the gameplay more engaging.
    • There is nothing to grind in the game, which I appreciate as it allows me to focus on the core gameplay without unnecessary repetitive tasks.
    • The game has no story, which I find neutral as it doesn't detract from the gameplay but also doesn't add any narrative depth.
    • The game offers infinite playtime, which I find positive as it provides long-term value and replayability.
    • The game has minor bugs, which I find slightly negative as they can occasionally disrupt the experience, but they are not game-breaking.

Positive

You could run this game on a nokia, which is good cause my computer is hardly any better than that. If you want to play bannerlord but own a potato that can't even run lethal company (my computer can't even run lethal company) then try this game.

  • Sentiments

    • I appreciate that this game can run on very low-end hardware, like a Nokia, which is great because my computer is not powerful.
    • My computer is hardly any better than a Nokia, which makes this game a good option for me.
    • If you want to play Bannerlord but have a potato computer that can't even run Lethal Company, this game is a viable alternative.
    • My computer can't even run Lethal Company, which highlights how low-end my system is.
    • This game is a good choice for players with very low-end systems who still want to enjoy a similar experience to Bannerlord.

Positive

This game is like witchcraft. You'll play for hour think its alright, clunky and obtuse but nothing really outstanding. Then you'll realize its 2 am and you've been staring at the same battlefield fighting 5 battles one after the other on the same repeated maps. And you'll wonder how the hell did that happen. There is almost no other game like it out there.

  • Sentiments

    • I feel the game has a unique and almost magical quality that keeps me playing for hours without realizing it.
    • I think the game is just alright, with nothing particularly outstanding about it.
    • I find the gameplay to be clunky and somewhat difficult to understand or navigate.
    • I notice that the game can be repetitive, with battles and maps feeling reused.
    • I am surprised by how the game manages to captivate me despite its flaws, making me lose track of time.
    • I feel there is almost no other game like this one, which makes it stand out in a unique way.

Positive

[h1] 100 out of 10! This is the Game of the Year! [/h1] But seriously, since the release of Mount & Blade: Warband has already passed many years! It would seem that the game is outdated and has lost its relevance because new projects on this theme have been released. But no, it is still being played. Even in the new games on the theme of the Middle Ages, there are no such opportunities as there are here. In addition to the excellent combat system and atmosphere, there is a huge variation in how you can play the game, although it is impossible to complete it. It is more like a medieval sandbox. The players set their own goals and create their own rules. As a result, the game can suck you in for a long time, but sooner or later it gets boring. To help in this case come mods, of which the game has a tremendous number. From the Paleolithic era to the Star Wars universe. As for the multiplayer, it is in good order up to this day. It has enough people even at night, so there will be no problems with finding online opponents. [strike] In standby for Mount & Blade II Bannerlord. [/strike] [spoiler] At last, we've got it! [/spoiler]

  • Sentiments

    • I believe this game is a masterpiece and deserves a perfect score, calling it the Game of the Year.
    • I think the game has stood the test of time and remains relevant despite its age.
    • I feel that the game offers unique opportunities and features that newer medieval-themed games lack.
    • I appreciate the excellent combat system and immersive atmosphere of the game.
    • I enjoy the sandbox nature of the game, where players can set their own goals and rules.
    • I acknowledge that the game can become boring over time, but mods help keep it fresh and engaging.
    • I am impressed by the vast number of mods available, ranging from the Paleolithic era to the Star Wars universe.
    • I find the multiplayer mode to be well-maintained and active, even during late hours.
    • I am excited about the release of Mount & Blade II Bannerlord, which adds to my anticipation for the future of the series.
    • I note that the game is impossible to complete, which might be a drawback for some players.

Negative

тупое говно. заходил как на вторую работу, захватывал все эти земли, думал захвачу будут прикольные титры или окошко про то что я терь повелитель всех земель. Захватил вообще всех, все земли были мои, ждал пока появится "*последнее королевство* померло", ждал где-то час. Там уже ушли все из него, было 0 вассалов. И я ждал... Но ничего не появилось!!! Все было зря. Кал. Гавно.

  • Sentiments

    • I felt extremely disappointed and frustrated because I spent a lot of time capturing all the lands, expecting a rewarding ending or acknowledgment, but nothing happened.
    • I thought the game would provide a satisfying conclusion or a special message when I conquered all the lands, but it failed to deliver.
    • I waited for about an hour for something to happen after capturing all the lands, but nothing occurred, which made me feel like my effort was wasted.
    • I felt deceived because the game did not acknowledge my achievement of becoming the ruler of all lands.
    • I found the game to be poorly designed because it did not provide any meaningful reward or recognition for completing such a significant task.
    • I felt like the game was a waste of time because it did not meet my expectations or provide any satisfaction after completing the main objective.
    • I was excited at first, thinking that conquering all the lands would lead to something special, but my excitement turned into disappointment.
    • I felt that the game lacked depth and meaningful content, as it did not offer any closure or acknowledgment for my efforts.
    • I was annoyed that the game did not provide any clear indication of what would happen after capturing all the lands, leading to confusion and frustration.
    • I found the game to be unfulfilling and poorly executed, as it did not reward the player for achieving the ultimate goal.

Negative

Note: this concerns only Mac users, Windows version is probably fine. Since the developers moved on to Bannerlords, Warband doesn't receive any attention whatsoever, which resulted in game being mostly unplayable on recent macOS versions. Textures are not loading (or loading broken), constant crashes and weird glitches. Most likely it has to do with M&B: Warband being 32bit game. And Catalina and up don't do that. I mean I completely understand that devs don't have time or priority to support the old game when they have enough on their plate with the new one. What I don't understand is why they keep charging $11.99 for an abandoned product and not giving customers any warning regarding it's state of disarray? Reduce the price or remove it from the macos platform completely. You'll save time for anyone on refunds. Shame, it was a great game.

  • Sentiments

    • I feel frustrated that the game, Mount & Blade: Warband, is mostly unplayable on recent macOS versions due to lack of developer support.
    • I am disappointed that the game experiences constant crashes, broken textures, and weird glitches on macOS.
    • I understand that the developers have moved on to Bannerlords and no longer prioritize supporting the old game.
    • I am confused and upset that the developers continue to charge $11.99 for an abandoned product without warning customers about its poor state.
    • I believe the developers should reduce the price or remove the game from the macOS platform to avoid wasting customers' time with refunds.
    • I feel a sense of shame because the game was once great but is now in a state of disarray.
    • I acknowledge that the game's issues are likely due to it being a 32-bit application, which is incompatible with macOS Catalina and later versions.
    • I am critical of the developers for not addressing the compatibility issues despite the game still being sold.
    • I feel let down by the lack of transparency from the developers regarding the game's current state.
    • I have fond memories of the game and am saddened by its current unplayable condition.

Negative

At some point, the developers added half-baked controller support to the game. This conflicts with the perfectly functional controller keyboard/mouse emulation that I had been using. The game is now unplayable with the controller, which, for me, makes it unplayable. Was a great game previously.

  • Sentiments

    • I feel frustrated because the developers added half-baked controller support, which conflicts with the previously functional controller keyboard/mouse emulation I was using.
    • I find the game unplayable with the controller now, which is a significant issue for me.
    • I believe the game was great previously, which makes the current issues even more disappointing.

Negative

This game is not it . While other games may be "it", this game is definitely not . Edit 11/12/2022 Mount and Blade, more like Mount my Balls. Edit 4/25/2023 I would like to apologize for the previous edit. While my "humor" has changed, and I find the previous edit unacceptable, I still do not like this game. Edit 10/26/2024 Haven't played in 9 years. Still don't plan to anytime soon.

  • Sentiments

    • I feel that this game is not worth playing, as it does not meet my expectations compared to other games.
    • I find the game to be disappointing and not enjoyable, as it fails to capture my interest.
    • I made a crude joke about the game's title, which reflects my frustration and dissatisfaction with it.
    • I later regretted my crude joke and acknowledged that my sense of humor has changed, but my dislike for the game remains.
    • I have not played the game in 9 years and have no intention of playing it again, which shows my lasting disinterest.

Negative

I bought it because of Napoleonic Wars (it is the more extensive version of Holdfast) but the game crashed three times in my short playing time and once forced me to shut down my PC due to a freeze. ..going back to Battle Grounds III.

  • Sentiments

    • I bought the game because of Napoleonic Wars, which is the more extensive version of Holdfast, and this aspect initially excited me.
    • The game crashed three times during my short playing time, which was extremely frustrating and disrupted my experience.
    • The game froze once, forcing me to shut down my PC, which was a major inconvenience and left me feeling disappointed.
    • I am considering going back to Battle Grounds III, which suggests dissatisfaction with the current game's performance.

© 2024